Let me try to explain. There are so many nerves in that bit of excess skin that the removal of them makes sex less exciting and pleasurable. You mentioned accidently screaming when you saw that English pecker. You seem to have the American view of the world. That’s ok, each one of us has a bit of foolishness each must overcum (again, sorry).

But I am wondering, the foreskin is protection for the most sensitive part of a man’s body. If you take a close look at the foreskin on this mans pecker, you would have seen the small brownish ‘ring’ around the end of the foreskin. This small ring has a special name that I do not remember right now, but it has a bucket load of nerves that are simply amazing. After circumcising, those wonderful feelings are gone. I MISS THEM! They are really cool and if a partner is experienced with foreskin this area can be manipulated to the point of trembling ecstasy! On average, this skin that is removed will be about 5 square inches and 20,000 nerve ending. That is a lot of feeling fibers.

I have been circumcised for many years now and I know that sex is always good, but with foreskin it is better! I have always wondered why some men do not keep the area clean. I did, and still do. It is so easy, just pull the skin back and rub the area with soap and water. I suppose it is like cleansing a womans clitoral area. Do you clean it like you should?

I think circumcision would be comparable for a woman to have her clitoris completely exposed to the atmosphere. Removing the hood, part of the labia, and any excess tissue that might be in the way. Would you care to have your clit hanging out in the world? It would be uncomfortable for quite some time, but with clothing and hair, and any other object to come in contact with your clit wouldn’t be acceptable to most women.

Think about the callus that would form on the clit or glans and all of the extra foreplay that would be required in order to have a quality sexual experience? There is a callus that is formed on the end of any mans pecker that is circumcised. Think about all of the pecker you might have experienced, the uncircumcised glans was soft and pink while the circumcised ones are generally much more gray, less soft, and less pliable.

Do you know when circumcision became so popular in America? 2 men named Kellogg and Graham – you know them today as the crazy doctor of corn flakes fame, and the man who manufactured crackers had the ‘’bright’’ idea. Their idea caught on because it came at the time when The Christian radicals was taking the nation by storm (yes way back when).

The idea was to keep little boys from masturbating, pulling his pudd, jacking off, jerking off, or playing with himself. Yep, that’s the only reason this bit of mutilation came to pass.

And the time produced inventions that were actually patented that did terrible bodily damage to the little boys’ growing stump for the only purpose to save their male souls, andto stop this nasty, revolting, and perverted activity of little boys. these patented inventions were indorsed by the Christians of their day and these machines were designed to cut, stab, or just crush his Johnson. Is this a reason to do the cutting?

There are men in the world that are messed up by the attending doctor who did this little trim so poorly that corrective surgery has to be done to repair the damage. Another group of men who have been cut back so badly that they must shave their penile shaft so the hair is not growing on it and more in this group of men who have been cut so tight that sex is actually uncomfortable or painful because the skin is just pulled so tightly. I think you would agree this is terrible! The latter group of men is estimated to be more than 1 in 200. That is a lot of men.

You have mentioned the possible link between circumcision and lowering the chance of catching one of the STD’s or AIDS. Shit, keep your pecker in his pants or wear a rubber and odds of catching something that may kill you or embraced you is well worth that piece of pussy.

Keep up the good work, even if you may not know what you are talking about sometimes.

Respectfully,
Dave

PS. I don't wear a shot glass on my pecker, but I am slowly rebuilding my foreskin.

And yeah Kinky Jew!!! you seem to be a nice person. but are you nice enough to apologize to all uncircumcised men for what you said about cleanliness?!!!!

moreover! how the hell can anybody have the balls to make his child suffer that surgery! ? it’s not ice age anymore people, we’re in 2010!!!!

and yeah, btw, kinky jew, you r right, that thing had been on for thousands of years, which in my opinion is enough to change it!!

how can u claim that we are not clean. if we are not clean, that would obvous, our penises wouldn’t look right, and bla bla bla… which makes it easier to you to be aware of sex…..

but why wouldn’t we clean ourselves out in the first place!!!??? do u really think you care about our cleanliness more than we do?! i wouldn’t risk it all to not clean under my foreskin.

i dont wanna be the anti-jew guy here, but trust me, i do know how do you feel, you have no choice about it, and you said that, clearly.

so if you dont even have the choice, why are you anti-uncut?????

see, the problem is not with the article itself – which is you personal experience- but rather with your sick comments.

we are in a free country, true. and everyone has a right for opinion, but NOBODY, AND BY NOBODY I MEAN NOBODY, HAS THE RIGHT TO DECIDE TO CIRCUMCISE HIS CHILD.

it’s a matter of few years anyway, before circumcision is banned, legally, and for ever.

back to you MOM, please change your nickname, because you can be good at anything but being MOM.

Finally, at Kinky Jew:
“Awww, funny Brit. Can’t write your own comments without plagerizing. It’s *almost* like you can think for yourself, huh? Almost.”
I think the Brit in question was being very clever. By reversing the situation, using the same words, they point out that what’s true for one culture may be quite different to another, under the same circumstances. By showing your contempt for them, you reveal an inability in yourself to see both sides of the argument, and I can only assume you are as stubborn in the rest of your life as you are in this. Also, you don’t “own” your children. EVER. “Owning” a person is akin to slavery. And forcing your will upon children that are too young to know better, or to young to protest, in any other circumstance, would be considered child cruelty.

This comment hit the spot :
” I think it’s mutilation and that most parents engage in the practice because “it’s what you do” not because it’s anything they’ve researched. Religious implications aside, would you cut off your daughter’s labia straight from the womb?”

People should really think on their own, not just follow anything. If we women want equality (and ooh boy I hope I won’t anger the hardcore feminists), then little boys should also have the same treatment on their genitals as little girls.

I really disagree with parents believing they can decide anything for their child until they are 18, but I don’t want to have a fight now, so I will not elaborate on the issue. It’s a far over-trodden path anyway.

This debate has been good, but both sides I think have said the same things over and over. There is nothing more to say !

Sounds like someone who is ok with slapping their children because it’s theirs. Or keeping them out of school because one don’t think it’s needed, or decide who they should marry, what they should eat, and so on so on.