Why I Want A Threesome With My Wife

ID-10050114Note: This is part two of a discussion about threesomes. In Part one, Ken’s wife Crissy shares her thoughts on having a MMF threesome.

———–

So a little while ago, I confessed in the comments of my wife’s post about FFM threesomes:

“for whatever reason, I’d actually rather have a MMF than a FFM.
bonus for you! me and my tag teammate’ll work you over real good.”

Now, I know very well that MOST male fantasies involving more than two participants revolve around the FFM variety: that is, two females, one male. Ask just about any guy out there what their #1 wish would be, and you’ll probably get the “two chicks at once” answer. A guaranteed top three rank for sure. Hell, it’s in MY top three.

So when I commented what I did, I knew it would come as a bit of a surprise to some. I knew I was going against the status quo.  I also knew I was being honest.

As it turned out, that day, at lunch, one of my coworkers said, “I read your comment. I thought it was kind of weird.”

“Weird?” I asked. “How so?”

“Well you said you’d actually PREFER it to the FFM version.”

Now, he was totally 100% on board with the “two chicks at once” version, but the inverse was a lot less palatable.  That I’d actually RATHER partner up with a dude to take on my luscious wife was beyond his understanding.

When I dug at him for the reason, he confessed that it was because he couldn’t watch his wife fuck another man.  At that point, one of my other coworkers chimed in and said, “Don’t worry, Ken–I’ve got your back.  Well, actually, your wife’s back.”

Thank god for good friends!

One of the replies (TWM’s, actually) to my original comment offered up the idea that more men probably share the same fantasy, but are dissuaded from admitting it due to the fear of it being perceived as a (at least partially) homosexual act.

So, seeing as MOST men seem to have little to no trouble with introducing another female to the mix (and actually will proudly admit to such), but there are multiple stigmas attached to adding another male, I decided to compare the two.  I wanted to really get at this issue of why, for most men, is FFM > MMF?

Typical/actual responses:

  • MMF — There’s another dude fucking the same girl as me. What if that dude is just a better fucker than I am?  What if the girl likes him better?
  • FFM — One chick is great. Two chicks is more than twice as good. Who cares if one is hotter than the other?  I’ll love fucking them both.
  • MMF — Hey, there’s two dicks in the room. They might even touch each other, or there may be some other kind of guy-guy contact. That’s gay!
  • FFM — Two chicks getting it on is just plain hot. Lesbian or not, my dick is hard.
  • MMF — If the female is “my girl” then she’s cheating on me! That makes her a whore.  And that’s a bad thing.
  • FFM — That motherfucker is one lucky bastard.  God I envy him!

Same scenario, different ratios–very different feelings.

WHY?  *rubs chin*

The FFM is obviously male-centric. If there’s any dick action going on, you know whose it’s going to be. There is one object of worship: the singular penis in the room.  Sounds great, no?  But practically speaking, this is the biggest issue for the FFM situation.  You really can’t fuck two things at the same time with one cock.  Sure, you can switch it up a lot, but it’s still only in one place at one time. If you want multiple penetrations you’re going to have to use something else (dildo, bedpost, finger, vibrator, eggplant, toe, etc).  When the only cock in the room blows its load, that’s it for a little while.

In the MMF case, it’s the other way around: the woman is now the commodity which is in short supply. She is the object to be worshipped and attended to, totally unique in her abilities and characteristics.

(I recognize that I am leaving out the other permutations of MMF coupling–those which involve direct male/male contact.  This in no way treats them as less valid or less satisfying forms, but was done intentionally to sidestep the “homosexual” aspect which I believe clouds the issue of a direct comparison between MMF and FFM.  There seems to be NO evidence to suggest female homosexuality is any kind of deterrent to the FFM instance, in direct contrast to those objections raised over MMF.  I believe it is possible to be completely heterosexual and still engage in threesomes of either flavor.)

Like most human beings, I like to be worshiped.  It makes you feel special, right?  What’s not to like.  The thing is, that’s not the BIGGEST turn on for me.  What really gets me going is the EFFECT I have on my wife.  I want to worship HER, to see how, with my art and craft and strength, I make HER wriggle and squirm and moan.  It’s for exactly this reason that while a playthrough helps let off steam and retain harmony in the pack, it’s no replacement for those times that I really have my wife begging for it.  THAT’S the good stuff… When she’s so turned on she can’t see straight or form coherent sentences. Giggity giggity!

For the same reason, the idea of double-teaming a woman has an incredibly naughty allure.  I believe it’s actually MORE naughty and taboo than the FFM case, which has really become quite socially acceptable and mundane (see: homophobia). It’s all about her!

After all, the woman in an MMF threesome is ipso facto more girl than one guy can handle. Unlike FFM, with MMF there are MULTIPLE cocks, and MULTIPLE holes.  More opportunity to give it and take it.  Suddenly a new option “opens up”: double penetration. Not “simulated” DP… we’re talking about the real deal. Lots of motion, lots of friction, different partners, different cocks, different rhythms.   A whole new world of combinations (DP, DAP, DPP, oral/vag, oral/anal) becomes possible.  The center wants attention.  She wants affection.  She wants to be fucked senseless. The men in the room are tools–sexual tools that exist only for her masturbatory pleasure.  They have been objectified into dicks and fingers and mouths–inanimate objects that serve only one purpose: to get her off.  She is a sex-starved, take-everything-you-can-dish-out woman–begging for it all, begging for release–and she can’t get enough of it.

What is that but the very definition of sluttiness (and my definition of epically fucking hot)?

FFM threesome?  Fun, for sure.  Exciting too!

MMF threesome?  Now that’s a thing which promises to unleash the immense latent female sexual power and capacity that must otherwise be kept deep and held secret for fear of pejorative judgments and social stigma.

To behold that bottomless pool of raw dripping lust, exposed and revealed, and to recklessly throw one’s self into it, is, to me, the ultimate form of worship and intimacy.

So here’s the part where I ask the TWMs (particularly you men) to chime in with their own thoughts/experiences/reactions/criticisms/accolades.  GO!

Photo by t0zz.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusyoutubeinstagram

98 comments

  1. Chuck

    All I can say is MMF is absolutely the best for all involved with or without bi contact between the guys. My hot wife and I started with me watching her with a guy and “claiming her” after he was finished. That’s still hot to do. But then we graduated toward having him as an equal partner in helping me please her. The fact that after the first guy came the other guy could go in and give her more pleasure was awesome. Then, of course, there are all the different combinations thanks to all the holes as discussed above! Finally, my wife confided that it would turn her on to watch me to some limited bi activity with a guy and if the other dude is cool with it, that is also incredible. Still dying to top a guy while he fucks my wife but that time will cum I hope! We don’t do this often despite having a couple of regulars. We don’t go out of town often either. Schedules, family obligations, careers, get in the way. That said, I am honestly convinced opening ourselves to MMF has kept our marriage so strong. We’re in our 40’s, and while multiple friends have been divorced due to cheating, we’re still happy as can be with sex only getting better. But the love and trust have to be there. My wife says most women, not all, aren’t capable of sex without some emotional attachment, so she’s been hesitant to do FFM due to jealousy factor, however she is open to it in a vacation setting. We’ll see. Whatever happens, it’s just fun.

  2. 超歓迎 人気

    You made some good points there. I looked on
    the net to learn more about the issue and found
    most individuals will go along with your views on this web
    site.

  3. Rezension

    I’m definitely satisfied along with your way with words-at all and also together with the design for a website. Is niagra a paid issue as well as have you adjust that oneself? In any event . continue the excellent excellent writing, it truly is rare to see a great web site like this one these days.

  4. live cams sex

    After I initially commented I appear to have clicked on the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and from now on
    each time a comment is added I recieve four emails with the same comment.
    Is there an easy method you can remove me from that service?
    Many thanks!

  5. HappyFemale

    As a woman who has done both MMF and FFM threesomes (many times, in fact – and I've spoken on how to do it successfully), there are pros and cons to both.

    For FFM: you have to get a guy who really worships women. If he just wants to stick it in until he comes, it's not going to be the most pleasurable experience for everyone. Also, throwing at least one woman who is more lesbian than bisexual makes things that much more exciting. While a lot of guys think it's all about them, the hottest ones I've had are where he becomes somewhat a slave…he's a tool for 2 women (who are into each other) to get off…and when THEY'RE done, they get him off.

    For MMF: I have done it with different combinations of 2 straight guys, 1 straight + 1 bi-curious, and 2 bi guys. It doesn't really matter. What Ken said is totally true – with MMF, it is ALL about the woman. And it's fucking HOT.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *